Home > Blog > July 2, 2011 – Sinopah Mountain and Pray Lake in Glacier National Park, Montana

July 2, 2011
Sinopah Mountain and Pray Lake in Glacier National Park, Montana

Sinopah Mountain and Pray Lake
Sinopah Mountain and Pray Lake
Glacier National Park, Montana, USA
Canon EOS 1Ds Mk III, 24 TS II, 2-stop hard grad ND, 3-stop ND, 6 sec, f8, ISO 100
Image taken on July 1, 2011.
Hooray — a recent image! Sinopah Mountain and Pray Lake at sunrise was made yesterday in Glacier National Park, Montana. I used a 2-stop hard grad ND (graduated Neutral Density) filter to balance the exposure between the bright sky and the darker foreground, and a 3-stop ND to lengthen the exposure to smooth out the waves on the lake because the wind was blowing like crazy!

I wish I had been able to capture more of the clouds, but without gum boots or hip waders, camera placement was limited by the shoreline. So, I've been thinking about the Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L again. That lens would have let me include more of the fantastic sky, but without a DIY (do it yourself) filter holder, I would have had to make the image with two exposures, and I wouldn't have been able to blur the wave motion. So, I almost ordered a AF-S NIKKOR 14-24mm f/2.8G ED because Lee Filters makes the SW150 Filter Holder for it which takes 150mm filters. However, at such a wide angle of view, the shift motion of the Canon TS-E 17 would sure be nice to control distortion — hmmm.

This particular blog entry is www.jameshagerphoto.com/blog/?date=2011-07-02. Visit www.jameshagerphoto.com/blog to view the latest blog entry, and you may click here to create a URL that you can bookmark to go to the latest blog entry.

Responses

July 3, 2011, 4:55 AM
by rjo
Rather than buying a new lens, wouldn't it be cheaper to just take two images and stitch them together in post processing as a vertical pano (more or less) to get more of the sky included? Just a thought.
This response was edited on July 3, 2011, 4:58 AM.
July 5, 2011, 1:37 PM
by James Hager
It would be cheaper for a one-off pano as you suggest, rjo, but repeatedly stitching images would be expensive because time sitting at the computer is money. Plus, I prefer to capture an image as complete as possible in-camera, and I generally don't like the look of panos --- I prefer 2x3 or 4x5 aspect ratio images.

New responses are closed.

All of the images on this site are ©James Hager and are intended for viewing only. They are not to be
downloaded or reproduced in any way without the written permission of James Hager Photography.